Construction — AI, data & automation
Use computer vision to surface safety concerns and hazards for site teams to review.
A practical delivery view
See the concern
Applications include missing safety gear, unsafe behaviour and restricted-area access alerts.
- Site safety monitoring
- Hazard early warning
- Restricted-area alerts
Account for the site
Camera views, weather, changing layouts and occlusion influence what a system can reliably detect. Evaluate on the actual environment.
- Camera placement review
- Real-world evaluation
- False-alert review
Keep people accountable
Alerts support a site safety process; they do not certify a site as safe or replace accountable human judgement.
- Defined escalation
- Human review
- Access and retention requirements
Why site safety is hard to watch
A construction site changes every day. New crews arrive, layouts move, and work happens at height, near machinery and across a wide area. Safety officers cannot be everywhere, and most footage from site cameras is never watched. Unsafe actions are usually recorded after an incident, when the useful moment has passed. Site teams need to hear about a concern while there is still time to act on it.
- Sites that change daily
- Too much area for a few officers
- Camera footage nobody reviews
- Concerns found after the incident
What we have built
Our computer vision work for construction covers site safety monitoring, early warning of hazards and harmful actions on site, and restricted-area monitoring. The system watches camera feeds and raises an alert for the site team to review. It supports the people responsible for safety and does not replace them. Each deployment is shaped by the site: camera positions, the hazards that matter most and who receives each alert.
- Site safety monitoring
- Early warning of hazards and harmful actions
- Restricted-area monitoring
- Alerts reviewed by the site team
Start with one site
Begin with a single site and a short list of concerns, for example entry to a restricted zone or one type of unsafe action. On a short call we review your camera coverage and how alerts should reach supervisors. A pilot on real footage shows what the system detects reliably and how many false alerts it raises. If you are comparing AI priorities across the business, start with the free AI readiness report.
- One site, a few defined concerns
- Camera coverage review
- Pilot on real footage
Questions that come up
What can site safety AI detect?
Our work covers site safety monitoring, early warning of hazards and harmful actions, and entry to restricted areas. What is detected reliably on your site depends on camera views, lighting, weather and distance, so every project includes evaluation on real footage.
Does it replace our safety officers?
No. It adds coverage that officers cannot provide alone. The system raises alerts, and accountable people decide what to do about each one. It does not certify a site as safe, and responsibility for safety stays with your team.
Can it use the cameras we already have?
Often some of them. Suitability depends on resolution, angle and what each camera can see. We review your current coverage first and say where an extra camera or a changed position would make a difference.
How are workers’ privacy and footage handled?
Who can view footage and alerts, how long they are kept and what they are used for are agreed for each project, in line with your privacy and compliance requirements. We recommend telling site workers clearly what is monitored and why.
Let’s talk about your next step.
The workflow, the data and what needs to change.